Reqnroll .NET BDD Framework
Overview
Reqnroll is a .NET BDD (Behaviour-Driven Development) framework, very similar to SpecFlow, used for writing automated acceptance tests in a natural, human-readable format.
Think of it as:
Cucumber/Gherkin for .NET applications.
It allows you to write tests in plain English using the Gherkin syntax, and then bind those steps to C# code that executes the test logic.
Reqnroll is fully open-source and community-driven. It was created as a drop-in replacement for SpecFlow after licensing concerns made some teams want a fully open, non-commercial alternative.
What Problem Does Reqnroll Solve?
Reqnroll is used to:
- Bridge the gap between business language and technical test automation
- Allow analysts, testers, and non-developers to write scenarios
- Provide living documentation of business requirements
- Automate acceptance tests that match real-world behaviour
- Ensure the system behaves as expected from the user’s perspective
It is particularly useful in Agile teams practicing BDD, ATDD, or using user stories.
How Reqnroll Works (High-Level)
1 Write scenarios in Gherkin (.feature files)
Feature: Login
Scenario: User logs in with valid credentials
Given the user is on the login page
When the user enters valid credentials
Then they should be redirected to the dashboard
2 Bind the Gherkin steps to C# step definitions
[Given("the user is on the login page")]
public void GivenTheUserIsOnLoginPage()
{
_browser.NavigateTo("/login");
}
[When("the user enters valid credentials")]
public void WhenUserLogsIn()
{
_browser.Fill("username", "stuart");
_browser.Fill("password", "password123");
_browser.Click("Login");
}
[Then("they should be redirected to the dashboard")]
public void ThenRedirectToDashboard()
{
_browser.Url.Should().EndWith("/dashboard");
}
3️ Execute the tests via:
- Visual Studio test runner
dotnet test- CI/CD pipeline (Azure DevOps, GitHub Actions, etc.)
Reqnroll parses the Gherkin, matches each step to a C# method, and runs the test.
Why Do Teams Choose Reqnroll?
- Fully Open-Source - No commercial licensing, no paid plugins.
- Drop-in replacement for SpecFlow - Many teams migrated seamlessly.
- Works with modern .NET - Supports .NET 6/7/8 and Visual Studio integration.
- Easy for non-engineers to read - Stakeholders can read tests in English.
- Encourages collaboration - Promotes the “three amigos” approach: Dev, QA, BA writing scenarios together.
Disadvantages of Reqnroll
- Slower test execution - BDD-style tests are heavier than plain unit tests.
- Requires discipline - Teams must write good scenarios, not overly granular ones.
- Not ideal for low-level testing - Unit & integration tests are still needed.
- Smaller ecosystem than SpecFlow - Still growing, fewer plugins/tools.
Reqnroll vs SpecFlow
| Feature | Reqnroll | SpecFlow |
|---|---|---|
| Licensing | Fully open-source | OSS but commercial plugins + enterprise edition |
| API Compatibility | High (often drop-in) | Original |
| IDE Integration | Good | Very good |
| Community | Growing | Large, established |
| Corporate Backing | Community-led | Commercial backing (Tricentis) |
For most teams, Reqnroll is a modern, open, simpler alternative to SpecFlow.
Summary
Reqnroll is a .NET BDD framework that lets you write acceptance tests using human-readable Gherkin syntax. It links those steps to C# methods and automates behaviour-driven scenarios.
Reqnroll is essentially an open-source alternative to SpecFlow, ideal for bridging business requirements with automated test execution in an Agile workflow.