Skip to content

SAGA design pattern

Overview

The SAGA design pattern is a microservices architectural pattern used to manage distributed transactions in a reliable and consistent way without relying on traditional two-phase commits or global transactions. Instead, it breaks a transaction into a series of smaller, independent steps or sub-transactions that are executed sequentially and managed through a coordinated workflow. Each sub-transaction has a compensating action to undo its effects in case of failure, ensuring the system can maintain consistency even when a failure occurs during a distributed transaction.

Why Use the SAGA Pattern?

In microservices architectures, distributed transactions are challenging because:

  1. Each service typically manages its own database.
  2. Distributed systems must handle partial failures gracefully without locking resources globally. The SAGA pattern offers a solution by allowing each service to execute its part of the transaction independently while ensuring eventual consistency through compensation.

Key Components of the SAGA Pattern:

  1. Sub-Transactions:
    • These are the smaller, independent steps that make up the overall transaction. Each sub-transaction is executed by a different microservice.
  2. Compensation:
    • If a sub-transaction fails, a compensating action (essentially a rollback) is executed to undo the effects of the completed steps.
  3. Coordinator:
    • Responsible for orchestrating or choreographing the sequence of sub-transactions. This can be implemented in two ways:
      • Orchestration-based SAGA.
      • Choreography-based SAGA.

Types of SAGA Patterns

Orchestration-Based SAGA:

  • A central orchestrator service coordinates and controls the flow of the SAGA.
  • The orchestrator sends commands to microservices to execute sub-transactions and compensating actions when needed.

Example Flow:

  • Orchestrator triggers Step A → If success, triggers Step B → If failure in Step B, triggers compensation for Step A.

Advantages:

  • Centralized logic and easier to manage.
  • Clear visibility into the workflow.

Disadvantages:

  • Single point of failure if the orchestrator goes down.
  • Tighter coupling between services and the orchestrator.

Choreography-Based SAGA:

  • Services communicate with each other using events. Each service listens for specific events, performs its task, and emits new events to trigger the next step.

Example Flow:

  • Service A performs its task and emits Event A Completed → Service B listens to this event, performs its task, and emits Event B Completed → If failure, a compensating event is emitted.

Advantages:

  • Decentralized and loosely coupled.
  • Scales well with more services.

Disadvantages:

  • Harder to debug and manage due to lack of centralized control.
  • Increased complexity in event-driven communication.

Steps in a SAGA Workflow

  1. Start the SAGA by initiating the first sub-transaction.
  2. Proceed with the next sub-transaction(s) in sequence or parallel, depending on the business requirements.
  3. If all sub-transactions succeed:
    • The transaction is complete, and the system reaches a consistent state.
  4. If any sub-transaction fails:
    • Trigger compensating actions for the already completed sub-transactions to revert the system to a consistent state.

Use Case Example: E-Commerce Order Processing

  1. Scenario:
    • A user places an order in an e-commerce system.
    • The workflow involves:
      • Deducting inventory.
      • Charging the customer’s payment method.
      • Creating the order.
  2. Steps in SAGA:
    • Step 1: Inventory Service reduces stock.
    • Step 2: Payment Service processes the payment.
    • Step 3: Order Service creates the order.
  3. Failure Handling:
    • If payment processing fails:
      • Compensate Step 1 by restoring the inventory.

Advantages of the SAGA Pattern

  1. No Global Locks:
    • Services operate independently, avoiding global locks or centralized transaction managers.
  2. Scalability:
    • Works well in distributed systems, allowing horizontal scaling of microservices.
  3. Flexibility:
    • Can be implemented using orchestration or choreography, depending on system needs.
  4. Eventual Consistency:
    • Ensures the system reaches a consistent state without requiring strict atomicity.

Challenges of the SAGA Pattern

  1. Complexity:
    • Implementing compensating actions and managing workflows can be challenging.
  2. Debugging:
    • Distributed workflows, especially in choreography-based SAGA, can be harder to trace and debug.
  3. Partial Failures:
    • Must handle edge cases where compensating actions fail or are insufficient to restore consistency.
  4. Latency:
    • Sequential steps may increase latency, especially in large-scale workflows.

Comparison with Two-Phase Commit (2PC)

Aspect SAGA Pattern Two-Phase Commit (2PC)
Approach Breaks transaction into smaller steps Global locking for strict atomicity
Scalability Highly scalable Limited scalability due to locks
Failure Handling Uses compensating actions Rolls back the entire transaction
Complexity Requires managing compensations Simpler implementation
Latency Higher latency due to multiple steps Lower latency for small transactions

Tools Supporting the SAGA Pattern

Orchestration:

  • Camunda: Workflow and decision automation platform.
  • Temporal: Orchestration for distributed systems.
  • AWS Step Functions: Serverless workflow service.

Choreography:

  • Apache Kafka: Event streaming for communication between services.
  • RabbitMQ: Message broker for event-based systems.

Summary

The SAGA pattern is a distributed transaction management strategy designed for microservices. It splits a global transaction into a series of steps, each with its own compensation logic. By using orchestration or choreography, the SAGA pattern ensures eventual consistency and avoids the complexity and overhead of global transactions, making it ideal for large, scalable, and distributed systems. However, it requires careful design to manage compensations, latency, and debugging in distributed environments.